Thursday, December 8, 2011




http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wreck_of_the_U.S.S._Maine,_ca._1898_-_NARA_-_512929.tif



On February 15,1898 the U.S.S. Maine exploded killing 260 American Sailors.  Graphic images of the damage immediately blew through the front pages of  major newspapers leaving readers entertained and startled at the same time. Media sold the distorted story of the Spanish being responsible for the catastophe, and OF COURSE to solve justice & peace, the United States directly landed itself into the Spanish-American War.

Now if we look at the situation rationally we can see the incident was nothing more than an accident.  There was never any direct evidence the caue of the explosion, however every war needs an excuse, and this was ours.  Looking back on the past, the masses should always question the information fueled by mainstream news media, rather than acting like hypnotized dummies assuming everything is fact.
 
'World Trade Center'
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34517490@N00/2974933002
'September 11, 2006 New York City,+NY'
http://www.flickr.com/photos/79874304@N00/241275106

 On September 11, 2001 we were once again presented with misinformation and sensationalism.   Two American Aircrafts crashed into the World Trade Center and believed the buildings collapse was caused by the  jet impact and  followed by fires throughout, with Muslim mastermind's behind the whole scandal. That illusion became our reality, but lets shed light on this rationally. How does a sophisticated air defence (which has been known to respond to emergencies) allow a plane to wander for an hour and half with no suspicion or questions asked?  How can the steel and titanium componenets of the aircraft that hit the Pentagon magically EVAPORATE?  Finally, how is it a structural steel buidling, that never in HISTORY collapsed due to fire,  fall  so neatly at the speed of gravity, while the concrete was reduced to dust? 

Jet fuel (kerosene) can't reach tempatures to melt steel. Pictures show a little volume of a flame, but a significant amount of molten oozing out the side of the builidng.  Molten steel and concrete were found all around Ground Zero, leading the accusation that Thermine, and exotic accelerant was used.  When this question arose, N.I.S.T immediatly refused to test for accelerants, even if this was the first time a building collapsed by fire.  Their reason being,  kerosene is incapable of poducing molten, therefore, there could've been any molten at Ground Zero, therefore we are all imagining this and there is no need for further research.  If, the explosions we caused was actually by jet fuel air, the tapes would've recorded widespread of burning, scortching and blistering throughout the building.   Instead evidence it's very clear there was a raid rate of pressure rise, and that is what caused shattering of walls, roofs, structural members, continued by the building being demolitshed.  Therefore, it must of been DEMOLITION itself to allow the structures to blow up and fall the way they did.




It is our own public officals who brought this distruction, hayhem and outcry upon us, in order for WORLD DOMINATION, economically & militarilly. They once again needed to preserve American miliatry dominance for the further generations to come.  Now we have hero's such as Pat Tillman to get our country inspired. It certainly isn't a concidence that eight days after the attack the Patriot Act was handed to congress, followe by a week of anthrax which cleared  officeds to be examined, and next thing you know, it becomes a law.  Now the Bush administraiton gains access to people's medical records, tax records and can conduct secret residential serches without notifying owners.

Meanwhile, executives from BP, Shell & Exon met with Dick Cheney's Energy task forced & admitted interest in profiting from Iraq oil feilds.  Blaming Muslims for the attacks was a gateway for our country to invade Iraq in order to profit from their land.

Years later and no one is benefiting from the disaster the United States Goverment has created.   What is even more wrong is denying anyone access to the REALITY of science, law and our nature to live as citizens serves neither the individuals or society as a whole.


No comments:

Post a Comment